Key result
Ultradian MAP fluctuations show ~60% greater power than circadian rhythms in dogs, independent of EMG.
Why the study?
The frequency and magnitude of ultradian fluctuations in arterial blood pressure and their relationship with electromyogram activity in conscious dogs were not well characterized.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
No immediate change to human BP assessment; leaves open whether ultradian fluctuations dominate in clinical populations.
Mean arterial blood pressure was measured for 2 days in conscious dogs to estimate the frequency of ultradian fluctuations and to compare the magnitudes of the ultra- and circadian fluctuations. The ultradian fluctuation had an average frequency of 0.38 +/- 0.04 cycle/h and 60% more power than the circadian rhythm. The ultradian fluctuation was consistently more powerful during daylight than nighttime hours, but there was no consistent change in the frequency with time of day. Electromyogram (EMG) activity was also measured to test a possible causal relationship between the two variables. There were both circ- and ultradian fluctuations in EMG activity, and the peak cross-spectral power was also in these frequency bands. The coherence function was also high, but the phase angle between the two variables was so variable, both in sign and in magnitude, that it was judged unlikely that there was tight coupling between them.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Blinowska et al. (1985) studied this question. Measurement of arterial pressure and electromyogram was evaluated on Frequency and power of ultradian fluctuations in mean arterial blood pressure. In conscious dogs, ultradian fluctuations in mean arterial blood pressure had an average frequency of 0.38 cycle/h and 60% more power than the circadian rhythm, with no tight coupling to EMG activity.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: