Key result
Higher cardiorespiratory fitness linked to ~0.3 m/s lower structural cfPWV.
Why the study?
Greater cardiorespiratory fitness is associated with lower large artery stiffness, but whether this beneficial relationship is driven by structural or load-dependent components remained unclear.
Does higher cardiorespiratory fitness reduce structural and load-dependent aortic large artery stiffness in older adults?
Cross-Sectional (n=799)
Does higher cardiorespiratory fitness reduce structural and load-dependent aortic large artery stiffness in older adults?
Higher cardiorespiratory fitness in older adults is associated with lower structural rather than load-dependent aortic stiffness, suggesting that fitness attenuates long-term arterial wall remodeling independently of blood pressure.
Supports structural arterial benefits of fitness independent of BP; extends cross-sectional data but leaves causal effects open.
Aging is associated with progressive large artery stiffening, which can be from structural (changes in the arterial wall) or load-dependent (higher blood pressure) mechanisms. Greater cardiorespiratory fitness (CRF) is associated with lower large artery stiffness, yet whether the beneficial relationship is from structural or load-dependent components remains unclear. Older adults (n=799, 72±5 years; 59.2% female) with CRF estimated via a 400m walk test (minutes) and aortic large artery stiffness assessed via carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity (cfPWV, m/s) were included in this cross-sectional analysis. Using participant-specific exponential models, aortic stiffness was standardized to a reference blood pressure to separate structural and load-dependent stiffness mechanisms. In linear regression adjusted for common cardiovascular disease risk factors, greater CRF (per minute) was associated with lower total cfPWV [B (95% CI), -0.23 m/s (-0.41,-0.05)] and structural cfPWV [-0.26 m/s (-0.45,-0.07)]. CRF was not associated with load-dependent cfPWV [0.03 m/s (-0.01,0.07)]. Stratified analyses suggest associations were strongest in males and participants aged ≥70 years (interaction p<0.05). In conclusion, higher CRF is associated with lower structural, but not load-dependent, aortic stiffness in older adults, suggesting the vascular benefits of CRF may reflect long-term attenuation of arterial wall remodeling rather than blood pressure driven mechanisms. By distinguishing structural and load-dependent components, this study offers a more precise understanding of how CRF relates to vascular aging than analyses relying on total cfPWV alone in older adults. Maintaining CRF, particularly into later life, may be an effective way to slow vascular aging and preserve health of the cardiovascular system.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Khairy et al. (2026) conducted a cross-sectional in Large artery stiffness in older adults (n=799). Cardiorespiratory fitness (estimated via 400m walk test) was evaluated on Structural carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity (cfPWV) (B -0.26 m/s, 95% CI -0.45 to -0.07). Greater cardiorespiratory fitness was associated with lower total (B -0.23 m/s; 95% CI -0.41 to -0.05) and structural (B -0.26 m/s; 95% CI -0.45 to -0.07) cfPWV, but not load-dependent cfPWV.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: