Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy, safety, and durability of temperature-controlled radiofrequency (TCRF) treatment of the nasal valve in patients with severe or extreme nasal airway obstruction (NAO). STUDY DESIGN: A long-term, prospective, multicenter, single-blind, randomized controlled trial. SETTING: Sixteen otolaryngologic clinics and academic centers. METHODS: Patients received TCRF treatment on the lateral nasal valve. All patients were followed through 3 years. Outcome measures included the Nasal Obstruction Symptom Evaluation (NOSE) Scale, Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS), and adverse events (AEs). Treatment responders were defined as a ≥1 reduction in severity class or ≥20% reduction in NOSE score. RESULTS: Out of 108 patients who received TCRF treatment, 54 reached the 3-year follow-up timepoint. The baseline mean NOSE score was 76.3 (95% confidence interval [CI], 73.6 to 79.1). The 3-year NOSE score treatment effect was -49.4 ([95% CI, -56.5 to -42.4]; P < .001) a 64.7% improvement from baseline; 88.7% of patients were responders. Most patients reported significant improvements in sleep post-treatment with a mean ESS score of 4.5 (95% CI, 3.4 to 5.7) at 3 years compared to 10.3 (95% CI, 9.2 to 11.4) at baseline. CONCLUSION: Treatment with the TCRF device for nasal valve obstruction resulted in sustained improvements in nasal obstruction symptoms and sleep quality over a 3-year period without any serious AEs. These findings support the long-term benefits and sustained improvements in symptoms in patients with NAO.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Han et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: