Key result
Diabetes linked to ~64% lower odds of achieving optimal secondary prevention after TIA or stroke.
Why the study?
Few studies have assessed the performance of stroke prevention clinics regarding patient compliance, therapeutic target achievement, and vascular event occurrence.
Observational (n=408)
No
Management in a stroke prevention clinic achieved good attainment of therapeutic goals, though patients with diabetes were significantly less likely to reach optimal therapy targets.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Diabetic patients may need targeted monitoring to close secondary prevention gaps after TIA or stroke; leaves open whether interventions improve attainment.
BACKGROUND: Few studies have assessed the performance of stroke prevention clinics. In particular, limited information exists on patient compliance, achievement of therapeutic targets, and related occurrence of vascular events. METHODS: We compared our clinical practice to recommendations from published guidelines in newly referred patients for transient ischemic attack (TIA) or ischemic stroke between 2008 and 2010. We monitored our cohort for at least 1 year and assessed for adequacy of vascular risk factor management, drug adherence, and occurrence of nonlethal vascular outcomes. RESULTS: Of 408 patients, 57.8% had a stroke and 42.2% a TIA. The mean age was 68±13 years, and 52% male. Average follow-up was 15.8 months. During follow-up, 253 patients (70.3%) completely achieved their blood pressure target, 151 (45.5%) achieved their low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol target, and 407 (99.8%) were on antithrombotics. Eighty-nine patients (21.8%) attained optimal therapy status, defined as reaching targets for LDL cholesterol, blood pressure, and antithrombotic use. Adherence to drug therapy was associated with attainment of optimal therapy status (p=0.01). Diabetes was associated with lower probability of attaining optimal therapy status (odds ratio [OR], 0.36; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.20-0.66) and blood pressure targets (OR, 0.09; 95% CI, 0.05-0.17). During follow-up, 52 (12.7%) patients had a nonlethal vascular event. CONCLUSION: Our study shows good attainment of therapeutic goals associated with adherence to drug therapy. However, optimal therapy status and blood pressure targets were more difficult to attain in patients with diabetes; therefore, more intensive preventive efforts may be required for these individuals.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Alsalti et al. (2014) conducted an observational in Transient ischemic attack or nondisabling ischemic stroke (n=408). Diabetes vs. Without diabetes was evaluated on Attainment of optimal therapy status (targets for LDL cholesterol, blood pressure, and antithrombotic use) (OR 0.36, 95% CI 0.20-0.66, p=0.001). Diabetes was associated with a lower probability of attaining optimal secondary prevention therapy status compared to patients without diabetes following a TIA or ischemic stroke.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: