Key result
Aortic root remodeling without coronary reimplantation is linked to similar mortality and fewer reinterventions versus Bentall.
Why the study?
Early and late outcomes of a modified aortic root remodelling technique without coronary ostial mobilisation or reimplantation have not been compared to the modified Bentall-de Bono procedure.
Does a modified aortic root remodelling technique without coronary ostial mobilisation improve survival and reduce re-operation compared to the modified Bentall-de Bono procedure in patients undergoing aortic root replacement?
Cohort (n=181)
No
Does a modified aortic root remodelling technique without coronary ostial mobilisation improve survival and reduce re-operation compared to the modified Bentall-de Bono procedure in patients undergoing aortic root replacement?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The modified ARR technique without coronary ostial mobilisation appears safe and feasible, offering comparable or potentially better long-term outcomes than the modified Bentall-de Bono procedure.
BACKGROUND: We compare the early and late outcomes of a modified aortic root remodelling (ARR) technique for aortic root replacement without mobilisation or reimplantation of the coronary ostia, with those of the modified Bentall-de Bono procedure. METHODS: A retrospective observational study was performed comprising 181 consecutive patients who underwent aortic root replacement with a modified Bentall-de Bono procedure (104 patients) or ARR (77 patients) between January 2013 and December 2019. Primary endpoints included hospital mortality and late survival. Secondary endpoints included incidence of post-operative complications and freedom from late re-operation. RESULTS: ARR procedures were performed with shorter cross-clamp times and comparable cardiopulmonary bypass times to modified Bentall-de Bono procedures. The incidence of early post-complications was comparable between groups. 30-day mortality was numerically lower with ARR than the modified Bentall-de Bono procedure. Over 7-year follow-up, 4 patients (3.8%) required repeat aortic surgery after a modified Bentall-de Bono procedure, and none after ARR. Long-term mortality after ARR and after modified Bentall-de Bono procedures was 17.1% and 22.7%, respectively. The cumulative incidence of reintervention on the aortic root/valve was 3.2% after a modified Bentall-de Bono procedure and 0% after ARR. When adjusted for other independent risk factors, late mortality was not influenced by the procedure performed, although competing risk adjusted for age showed that the modified Bentall-de Bono procedure was associated with an increased risk of aortic root/aortic valve re-operation. CONCLUSIONS: The modified ARR technique is associated with reduced myocardial ischaemia time, lower post-operative mortality and aortic re-intervention rates compared to a modified Bentall-de Bono procedure. It may be considered a safe and feasible procedure for aortic root/ascending aortic replacement offering good long-term outcomes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hadjinikolaou et al. (2023) conducted a cohort in Sinus of Valsalva dilatation and disease of the aortic valve not amenable to repair (n=181). Aortic root remodelling (ARR) without coronary ostial mobilisation or reimplantation vs. Modified Bentall-de Bono procedure was evaluated on Late mortality at 7 years (HR 1.411, 95% CI 0.58-3.44, p=0.519). Aortic root remodelling without coronary ostial reimplantation resulted in similar 7-year mortality and a lower cumulative incidence of aortic reintervention compared to the modified Bentall-de Bono procedure.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: