Key result
Standardized CO2 protocol with CBCT achieves 100% FEVAR success in patients with CKD.
Why the study?
The feasibility and efficacy of a standardized CO2 protocol and CO2 cone beam computed tomography for procedural completion in FEVAR of complex aortic aneurysms in patients with CKD were not established.
Does a standardized CO2 protocol with CO2 cone beam computed tomography provide feasible and effective completion imaging during fenestrated endovascular aneurysm repair in patients with complex aortic aneurysms and chronic kidney disease?
Observational (n=10)
Does a standardized CO2 protocol with CO2 cone beam computed tomography provide feasible and effective completion imaging during fenestrated endovascular aneurysm repair in patients with complex aortic aneurysms and chronic kidney disease?
CO2 cone beam computed tomography is a feasible and safe alternative to iodine contrast for completion imaging during complex fenestrated endovascular aneurysm repair in patients with chronic kidney disease.
CO2 CBCT may support feasible completion imaging in FEVAR for CKD; hypothesis-generating and requires prospective validation before practice change.
Purpose: To assess the feasibility and efficacy of a standardized CO 2 protocol and CO 2 cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) for procedural completion in fenestrated endovascular aneurysm repair (FEVAR) of complex aortic aneurysms in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD). Materials and Methods: Ten patients with complex aortic aneurysms and CKD (estimated glomerular filtration rate <90 ml/min) underwent FEVAR with custom-made fenestrated devices, using CO 2 as the primary contrast agent. Procedures were conducted in a hybrid operating room following a standardized CO 2 protocol with optimized injection parameters and visualization techniques to maximize CO 2 imaging efficacy. CO 2 CBCT was performed intraoperatively to verify stent graft deployment, bridging stent positioning, target vessel patency, and the presence of potential endoleaks. Results: All 10 procedures were completed successfully without intraoperative complications or CO 2 -related adverse effects. Completion CO 2 CBCT provided clear visualization of visceral and renal vessels, and no significant endoleaks were detected. One procedure was entirely iodine contrast-free, while minimal iodine contrast was used in others to address diagnostic uncertainties. Postoperative renal function remained stable across all patients. Conclusion: CO 2 CBCT is a feasible and effective alternative for completion imaging in complex FEVAR procedures for patients with CKD, potentially reducing the need for iodine contrast and the associated risk of nephropathy. A standardized CO 2 protocol can enhance procedural safety. Further research with larger cohorts is needed to confirm these findings. Clinical Impact CO 2 serves as the preferred contrast medium for the endovascular treatment of patients with iodine contrast allergies or those afflicted with chronic kidney disease (CKD) to preserve further renal deterioration. Ensuring protection from potentially harmful substances is paramount during endovascular repair in such patients. Equally crucial is performing the procedure safely through a standardized protocol and confirming its accuracy upon completion. Nevertheless, the possibility of employing CO 2 for cone beam computed tomography provides invaluable insights into procedural efficacy, thereby enhancing outcomes for CKD patients undergoing complex endovascular repair.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Esposito et al. (2025) conducted an observational in Complex aortic aneurysms and chronic kidney disease (n=10). Standardized CO2 protocol and CO2 cone beam computed tomography was evaluated on Procedural completion without intraoperative complications or CO2-related adverse effects. A standardized CO2 protocol and CO2 cone beam computed tomography enabled successful completion of fenestrated endovascular aneurysm repair in 100% (10/10) of patients with chronic kidney disease.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: