Key result
Diabetes is linked to a ~70% higher risk of secondary CV events in CAD patients.
Why the study?
Risk stratification for secondary cardiovascular events in patients with known CAD requires comparison of traditional risk factors and clinical variables to improve prediction.
Cohort (n=3,229)
Yes
Combining traditional risk factors with clinical variables such as ejection fraction and renal function significantly improves risk stratification for secondary cardiovascular events in patients with known coronary artery disease.
May aid secondary event risk stratification in CAD; leaves open whether clinical variables add value beyond traditional factors.
BACKGROUND: Risk factors are important in cardiovascular (CV) medicine for risk stratification of patients. We aimed to compare the traditional risk factors to clinical variables for the prediction of secondary cardiovascular events. METHODS AND RESULTS: For this study, 3229 patients with known coronary artery disease (CAD) were included. We calculated whether the traditional risk factors, diabetes mellitus, increased LDL/HDL ratio, arterial hypertension and smoking alone and in combination with the clinical variables, ejection fraction, creatinine clearance, multi-vessel disease and CRP concentration predict the outcome cardiovascular death or non-fatal myocardial infarction (N = 432) during the mean follow-up time of 4.2 ± 2.0 years. In this cohort diabetes mellitus was the risk factor with the strongest influence regarding occurrence of secondary events (hazard ratio; HR:1.70, confidence interval; CI 95%: 1.36-2.11; P<0.0001), followed by LDL/HDL ratio and smoking. However, risk stratification is further improved by using additional clinical variables like ejection fraction (HR:3.30 CI 95%:2.51-4.33; P>0.0001) or calculated creatinine clearence (Cockroft-Gault formula) (HR:2.26 CI 95%:1.78-2.89; P<0.0001). Further ameliorating risk stratification from the clinical variables were CRP and multi-vessel disease. The most precise risk prediction was achieved when all clinical variables were added to the CV risk factors. CONCLUSION: Diabetes mellitus has the strongest influence to predict secondary cardiovascular events in patients with known CAD. Risk stratification can further be improved by adding CV risk factors and clinical variables together. Control of risk factors is of paramount importance in patients with known CAD, while clinical variables can further enhance prediction of events.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zengin et al. (2015) conducted a cohort in Coronary artery disease (n=3,229). Diabetes mellitus vs. No diabetes mellitus was evaluated on Cardiovascular death or non-fatal myocardial infarction (HR 1.70, 95% CI 1.36-2.11, p=<0.0001). Diabetes mellitus was the strongest traditional risk factor for predicting secondary cardiovascular events (HR 1.70) in patients with known coronary artery disease.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: