Key result
Preincisional levobupivacaine lowers pain scores and analgesic use vs postincisional infiltration.
Why the study?
The use of local anesthetics for pain management following neck surgery is not a well-studied field.
Does preincisional wound infiltration with 0.25% levobupivacaine improve pain management compared to postincisional infiltration in patients undergoing thyroid surgery?
RCT (n=60)
Does preincisional wound infiltration with 0.25% levobupivacaine improve pain management compared to postincisional infiltration in patients undergoing thyroid surgery?
Preincisional wound infiltration with levobupivacaine provides superior pain control and patient satisfaction compared to postincisional infiltration in thyroid surgery.
Preincisional levobupivacaine infiltration should be prioritized in thyroid surgery; extends preemptive analgesia evidence from prior RCTs.
Aim: The use of local anesthetics for pain management following neck surgery is not a well-studied field. Material and Method: Sixty patients scheduled for thyroid surgery were randomly allocated into two groups. Wound infiltration with 0.25% levobupivacaine was performed before the incision in Group 1 and at the end of surgery in Group 2. Pain scores and side effects were followed for 24 hours. Intraoperative and postoperative analgesic consumption and first analgesic requirement time were recorded for each patient. Patient satisfaction was also evaluated at the end of 24 hours. Results: Lower pain scores, less analgesic consumption, later analgesic requirement and better patient satisfaction were obtained in the preincisional infiltration group.Discussion: Local anesthetic infiltration is a safe, practical method of pain management following thyroid surgery. Preincisional wound infiltration gives better results.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
A 2017 study conducted an RCT in Thyroid surgery (n=60). Preincisional levobupivacaine infiltration vs. Postincisional levobupivacaine infiltration was evaluated on Pain scores, analgesic consumption, first analgesic requirement time, and patient satisfaction. Preincisional 0.25% levobupivacaine infiltration resulted in lower pain scores, less analgesic consumption, and better patient satisfaction compared to postincisional infiltration.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: