Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
BACKGROUND: The aim of this investigation was to assess the effects of different treatments of demineralised enamel on microleakage under orthodontic brackets. METHODS: Seventy-five intact premolars were randomly assigned to five groups. The teeth in groups 2 through 5 were immersed in a demineralising solution for 16 weeks. In groups 1 (control) and 2 (demineralised/control), conventional acid etching was used. In group 3, sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl) was applied on the enamel surface for 1 min after acid etching, and in group 4, Transbond Plus (3M Unitek, Monrovia, CA, USA) self-etching primer (SEP) was used. The teeth in group 5 were treated with 2% sodium fluoride (NaF) for 4 min before etching. After bracket bonding, the specimens were thermocycled, sealed with nail varnish, immersed in 0.5% basic fuchsine solution for 24 h and sectioned. Microleakage was measured under a stereomicroscope for the enamel-adhesive and adhesive-bracket interfaces of both occlusal and gingival sides. RESULTS: Demineralised teeth showed more microleakage at the enamel-adhesive interface on both occlusal and gingival sides compared to sound teeth, but the difference was not significant (P>0.005). Treating the demineralised enamel with 5% NaOCl or Transbond Plus SEP was not effective in reducing microleakage. NaF treatment followed by acid etching of demineralised enamel resulted in significantly lower microleakage in most comparisons (P<0.005). CONCLUSIONS: The use of 2% NaF on hypomineralised enamel before the bracket bonding procedure is an effective way to decrease microleakage.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Moosavi et al. (2013) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: