Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This remark argues for the Case-theoretic concept of Case as a syntactic licensing requirement of DPs related to their case morphology, against alternatives where DPs need no syntactic licensing, or where their case morphology is unrelated to it. The argument is made from constraints on combining exceptional Case marking (ECM) and the double object construction, where there is a single object Agree/Case locus for two DPs. The mechanisms and nature of Case are briefly examined. The appendix sketches an extension to wager-class ECM.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Milan Řezáč (2013) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: