Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The Global Rating of Change Score (GRoC) is a frequently used outcome measure that is used independently to measure improvements in a patient's condition or as an anchor for other outcomes measures. The tool has been criticized for recall bias, biases in administration, and for poor reliability over time. Our findings, captured from a sample of patients with shoulder impingement, suggest that all these concerns are of merit. Our results show poor correlation of the GRoC with functional measures after 2 and 3 weeks and decay of the associative stability of the GRoC from week to week.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Garrison et al. (2012) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: