Key result
Pneumococcal vaccination linked to ~47% lower MI risk, strongest two or more years after exposure.
Why the study?
Pneumococcal vaccination was hypothesized to protect patients from myocardial infarction based on promising laboratory study results.
Does pneumococcal vaccination reduce the risk of myocardial infarction in at-risk patients?
Case-Control (n=4,995)
Does pneumococcal vaccination reduce the risk of myocardial infarction in at-risk patients?
Odds Ratio: 0.53 (95% CI 0.4–0.7)
Pneumococcal vaccination is associated with a significantly reduced risk of myocardial infarction, particularly when administered 2 or more years prior to the event.
Does not support practice change; leaves open whether pneumococcal vaccination reduces MI risk in randomized trials.
BACKGROUND: Based on promising results from laboratory studies, we hypothesized that pneumococcal vaccination would protect patients from myocardial infarction. METHODS: We conducted a hospital-based case-control study that included patients considered to be at risk of myocardial infarction. We used health databases to obtain hospital diagnoses and vaccination status. We compared patients who had been admitted for treatment of myocardial infarction with patients admitted to a surgical department in the same hospital for a reason other than myocardial infarction between 1997 and 2003. RESULTS: We found a total of 43 209 patients who were at risk; of these, we matched 999 cases and 3996 controls according to age, sex and year of hospital admission. Cases were less likely than controls to have been vaccinated (adjusted odds ratio [OR] 0.53, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.40-0.70). This putative protective role of the vaccine was not observed for patients who had received the vaccine up to 1 year before myocardial infarction (adjusted OR 0.85, 95% CI 0.54-1.33). In contrast, if vaccination had occurred 2 years or more before the hospital admission, the association was stronger (adjusted OR 0.33, 95% CI 0.20-0.46). INTERPRETATION: Pneumococcal vaccination was associated with a decrease of more than 50% in the rate myocardial infarction 2 years after exposure. If confirmed, this association should generate interest in exploring the putative mechanisms and may offer another reason to promote pneumococcal vaccination.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lamontagne et al. (2008) conducted a case-control in myocardial infarction (n=4,995). Pneumococcal vaccination vs. No pneumococcal vaccination was evaluated on myocardial infarction (OR 0.53, 95% CI 0.40-0.70). Pneumococcal vaccination was associated with a reduced risk of myocardial infarction (adjusted OR 0.53; 95% CI 0.40-0.70), with the strongest effect seen 2 or more years after exposure.
Synapse has enriched one closely related paper. Consider it for comparative context: