Key result
TAVI leaves all patients and caregivers satisfied with the decision despite persistent one-year symptom burden.
Why the study?
There is limited evidence from the perspectives of patients and family caregivers on their perceived benefits and challenges after TAVI at one year post-procedure.
What are the perspectives of older adults and family caregivers on undergoing TAVI at one year post-procedure?
What are the perspectives of older adults and family caregivers on undergoing TAVI at one year post-procedure?
While patients and caregivers are satisfied with TAVI at one year, clinicians must manage expectations regarding persistent symptom burden and provide adequate support for recovery in the context of aging and comorbidities.
Patients and caregivers value TAVI yet report unmet support needs amid comorbidities; leaves open how best to optimize shared decision-making and recovery pathways.
BACKGROUND: Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) is the treatment of choice for frail, older adults with severe symptomatic aortic stenosis. Although research about long-term clinical outcomes is emerging, there is limited evidence from the perspectives of patients and family caregivers on their perceived benefits and challenges after TAVI. AIMS: The aim of this study was to describe older adults and family caregivers' perspectives on undergoing TAVI at one year post-procedure. METHODS: Qualitative description was the method of inquiry. A purposive sample of 31 patients and 15 family caregivers was recruited from a TAVI programme in western Canada. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with participants one year after TAVI. Data were analysed thematically. RESULTS: All participants were satisfied with the decision to undergo TAVI. There were three central themes. First, recovery was experienced in the context of aging and comorbidities, which was shaped by patients' limited options for care and post-procedure symptom burden. Second, reconciling expectations with reality meant that, for some patients, symptom burden remained prevalent and was also influenced by others' expectations. Third, recommendations for recovery related to having information needs met, keeping informed of evolving care processes, and addressing individualised needs for support. CONCLUSIONS: The perspectives of participants provide a valuable contribution to the literature about undergoing TAVI. Clinicians need to be attentive to patients' expectations of benefit and temper these with consideration of the individual's broader health situation to provide treatment decision support. Patients and family caregivers also need adequate teaching and support to facilitate safe transition home given the shift towards early discharge after TAVI.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Baumbusch et al. (2017) studied Severe symptomatic aortic stenosis (n=46). Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) was evaluated on Perspectives on undergoing TAVI at one year post-procedure. One year after TAVI, all 46 interviewed patients and caregivers were satisfied with the decision to undergo the procedure, though recovery was complicated by aging and persistent symptom burden.
Synapse has enriched 4 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: