Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
In this paper are derived consistency and asymptotic normality results for the output-error method of system identification. The output-error estimator has the advantage over the prediction-error estimator of being more easily computable. However, it is shown that the output-error estimator can never be more efficient than the prediction-error estimator. The main result of the paper provides necessary and sufficient conditions for the output-error estimator and the prediction-error estimator to have the same efficiency, irrespective of the spectral density of the noise process.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Paul Kabaila (1983) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: