Key result
This editorial discusses a study of 103,642 persons across 15 cohorts evaluating the association of cigar, pipe, and smokeless tobacco use with cardiovascular disease outcomes and mortality.
Why the study?
Does the use of cigar, pipe, and smokeless tobacco affect cardiovascular disease outcomes and related mortality?
Does the use of cigar, pipe, and smokeless tobacco affect cardiovascular disease outcomes and related mortality?
This editorial highlights a large pooled cohort analysis investigating the cardiovascular risks associated with noncigarette tobacco products.
Morbidity and mortality caused by cigarette smoking has been documented and established over multiple decades, 1 yet much less is documented about the morbidity and mortality impact of other types of tobacco products.Tasdighi et al 2 address this knowledge gap with analysis of the association of cigar, pipe, and smokeless tobacco use with cardiovascular disease (CVD) outcomes and related mortality among 103 642 persons studied across multiple decades up through 2015.The study by Tasdighi et al 2 relies on data from the Framingham cohort, studied in detail over multiple generations since 1948, and 14 additional cohorts.Because each of these cohorts used sometimes unique approaches to measuring tobacco use patterns and cardiovascular outcomes, the study relied on extensive methodological work by the Cross Cohort Collaboration Tobacco Working Group.3 This working group harmonized tobacco use measures and health outcomes to allow
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wilson M. Compton (2025) conducted an editorial in Cardiovascular disease (n=103,642). Cigar, pipe, and smokeless tobacco use was evaluated on Cardiovascular disease (CVD) outcomes and related mortality. This editorial discusses a study of 103,642 persons across 15 cohorts evaluating the association of cigar, pipe, and smokeless tobacco use with cardiovascular disease outcomes and mortality.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: