Key result
Only ~49% of surveyed pregnant women are aware of CMV risks, lagging behind other infections.
Why the study?
Awareness of congenital cytomegalovirus infection and its determinants during pregnancy were not well characterized in Germany.
What is the level of awareness of congenital CMV infection among pregnant women in Germany?
Cross-Sectional (n=1,233)
Yes
What is the level of awareness of congenital CMV infection among pregnant women in Germany?
Less than half of pregnant women in Germany are aware of the potential risks associated with CMV infection during pregnancy, highlighting a need for increased education and hygiene preventive measures.
May warrant CMV counseling in prenatal visits; leaves open whether education reduces congenital infection rates.
BACKGROUND: Study aimed to assess awareness of congenital cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection and its determinants in pregnancy. METHODS: Cross-sectional survey was conducted in five hospital-based maternity units in Germany. Pregnant women attending the maternity departments completed interviewer/self-administered survey questionnaire. High-risk group was defined according to contact with children under five years of age (at home or at work). Quantitative analyses using multivariable logistic regression were performed. RESULTS: One thousand two hundred thirty-three pregnant women were included. 48.5% (n = 598) of women reported any knowledge about risk of CMV infection during pregnancy. CMV infection was less known than other infections or diseases (education about toxoplasmosis 95.5% (n = 1,177), listeriosis 60.5% (n = 746). 38% (n = 468) of participants received education about CMV. CMV awareness was associated with the level of education and employment in childcare or medical care. Only 32% (n = 394) of the women made use of serological screening for CMV during pregnancy (individual health service). 40.8% (n = 503) of pregnant women were classified as high-risk group. They had significantly higher knowledge and education about CMV, and msignificantlycant more often use of the serological screening. CONCLUSIONS: Less than half of pregnant women surveyed were aware of potential risk associated with CMV infection during pregnancy. In our study,one-third third of pregnant women made use of the serological screening for CMV. Regarding the lack of current consensus on the role of serological CMV screening for pregnant women, hygiene preventive measures are the only evidence-based recommendation for pregnant women and knowledge increase could potentially have major public health impact.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Greye et al. (2022) conducted a cross-sectional in Pregnancy (n=1,233). Socio-demographic determinants (e.g., employment in childcare/medical care) vs. Average-risk pregnant women was evaluated on Awareness of risk of CMV infection during pregnancy. Only 48.5% of surveyed pregnant women in Germany were aware of the potential risks associated with cytomegalovirus infection during pregnancy, which was significantly lower than awareness of other infections like toxoplasmosis.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: