Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This paper argues that science's reputation as a ‘hard’ subject can be attributed to four intrinsic features of science and/or learners: that science knowledge provides, for many learners, insufficient ‘pay off’ for the effort involved in understanding; that learning science involves reconstructions of meaning; that the tension between science as consensually agreed knowledge and science as enquiry is confusing and eventually alienating for many learners; and because science is abstract. The reasons for a link between abstraction and difficulty are briefly explored. It is suggested that certain extrinsic features of science education, resulting from choices by science educators, exacerbate these intrinsic difficulties.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Robin Millar (1991) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: