This article introduces a symposium on sexual selection in plants and animals and seeks a definition of sexual selection that applies to both kingdoms. Ten different criteria that could be used as a basis for defining sexual selection are reviewed. In particular, I argue that "mate choice" and "sexual competition" are problematic elements that should be avoided in a definition. In place of these elements, I argue for a mating success definition of sexual selection and propose that it constitutes a unifying concept that applies to both plants and animals.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Stevan J. Arnold (1994) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: