Judicial work and traumatic stress: Vilification, threats, and secondary trauma on the bench.

This article reports the results of a survey of judicial officers’ exposure to potentially traumatic stressors in a single state in Australia. An online survey was fully or partially completed by 205 serving and retired members of state courts between June and August of 2019. Respondents answered questions in a Yes/No and Likert scale format and provided comments on their experience and recommendations for the future. The survey focused on the prevalence and impact of three kinds of traumatic stress: threats to the person, vicarious trauma, and vilification. It sought to measure prevalence and to identify how different events in the workplace impacted psychological wellbeing and traumatic stress. The overall response rate was 55.3%, with 205 out of 371 judicial officers providing a full or partial response. The results indicated that 61% of respondents had experienced threats of violence to themselves or someone close to them. Three quarters (75.1%) of respondents reported being exposed to events associated with vicarious trauma, and 61 (29.7%) reported symptoms consistent with trauma-related effects. Just over half (52.7%) reported instances of harsh public criticism amounting to vilification. On the Kessler 10 scale of psychological distress 25.9% scored in the “moderate” range, 18.9% in the “high” range, and 9.8% in the “very high” range, much higher than the general population’s distress distribution. Respondents also rated the usefulness of current support resources and made recommendation for future resources.