Key result
Higher routine lab-based frailty index linked to ~8% greater mortality after SAVR in elderly patients.
Why the study?
The prognostic value of the frailty index based on routine laboratory data (FI-L) in elderly patients undergoing surgical aortic valve replacement was unclear.
Is a frailty index based on routine laboratory data (FI-L) associated with adverse outcomes after surgical aortic valve replacement in elderly patients?
Observational (n=154)
No
Is a frailty index based on routine laboratory data (FI-L) associated with adverse outcomes after surgical aortic valve replacement in elderly patients?
Hazard Ratio: 1.075 (95% CI 1.04–1.111)
p-value: p=<0.001
A frailty index based on routine laboratory data is significantly associated with early and long-term mortality after surgical aortic valve replacement in elderly patients, suggesting frailty should be considered in decision-making.
May refine preoperative risk stratification in elderly SAVR patients; extends lab frailty data but leaves open prospective validation.
BACKGROUND: This study was conducted to evaluate the prognostic value of the frailty index based on routine laboratory data (FI-L) in elderly patients who underwent surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR). METHODS: A total of 154 elderly patients (≥ 75 years) (78.7 ± 3.6 years; men:women = 78:76) who underwent aortic valve replacement with stented bioprosthesis between 2001 and 2018 were enrolled. The FI-L was calculated as the proportion of abnormal results out of 32 items based on laboratory tests, pulse rate and blood pressure. The primary outcome was all-cause mortality. Secondary outcomes included operative mortality and aortic valve-related events (AVREs) during follow-up. The predictive values of FI-L for the early and late outcomes were evaluated using logistic regression and Cox proportional hazards models, respectively. The median follow-up duration was 40 months (interquartile, 15-74). RESULTS: The operative mortality rate was 3.9% (n = 6). Late death occurred in 29 patients. The overall survival (OS) rates at 5, 10, and 15 years were 83.3%, 59.0%, and 41.6%, respectively. The AVREs occurred in 28 patients and the freedom rates from AVREs at 5, 10, and 15 years were 79.4%, 72.7%, and 52.9%, respectively. Multivariable analyses demonstrated that FI-L was a significant factor for OS (hazard ratio, 1.075; 95% confidence interval, 1.040-1.111). A minimal P value approach showed that a FI-L of 25% was the best cutoff value to predict OS after SAVR. CONCLUSION: The FI-L is significantly associated with early and long-term outcomes after SAVR in elderly patients. Frailty rather than a patient's age should be considered in the decision-making process for SAVR in elderly patients.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sohn et al. (2019) conducted an observational in Aortic valve disease requiring surgical aortic valve replacement (n=154). Frailty index based on routine laboratory data (FI-L) vs. Lower FI-L score was evaluated on All-cause mortality (overall survival) (HR 1.075, 95% CI 1.040-1.111, p=<0.001). A higher frailty index based on routine laboratory data (FI-L) was significantly associated with decreased overall survival after surgical aortic valve replacement in elderly patients (HR 1.075).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: