Key result
Dual-stream CNN successfully classifies abnormal heart sounds from short-term recordings.
Why the study?
Wearable devices capable of continuous monitoring and early detection of cardiovascular diseases require accurate heart sound classification methods adaptable to different recording equipment.
A novel dual-stream convolutional neural network framework accurately detects abnormal heart sounds, showing potential for deployment on smart wearable devices for cardiovascular disease screening.
Cardiovascular diseases (CVDs) is considered a serious public health problem due to the uncertainty of its onset. Consuming wearable devices have increasing popularities for healthcare monitoring, and many of them are capable of continuous monitoring and early detection of CVDs. This paper proposes a framework for heart sound detection that can be considered for deployment on smart wearable devices to screen CVDs conveniently. A dual-stream convolutional neural network (DS-CNN) is developed to detect abnormal ones from short-term heart sound recordings. Preprocessing module is first employed for noise filtering and amplitude normalization. Then short-time Fourier transform and higher-order spectral are introduced for feature extraction, whose products are subsequently fed into the DS-CNN for screening abnormal heart sound signals. Two open accessible datasets are employed for performance evaluation. The results well demonstrate the classification accuracy of the proposed DS-CNN, and also indicate its advantages for adapting to heart sound recordings collected by different equipments.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Guo et al. (2023) studied Cardiovascular diseases (abnormal heart sounds). Dual-stream convolutional neural network (DS-CNN) was evaluated on Classification accuracy of abnormal heart sound signals. A dual-stream convolutional neural network (DS-CNN) successfully classified abnormal heart sounds from short-term recordings across two open datasets.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: