Key result
Therapeutic genome editing requires specific development and regulatory considerations to ensure safe and effective medicines.
Why the study?
Therapeutic genome editing is rapidly evolving with new modalities requiring specific development and regulatory considerations beyond standard gene and cell therapies.
This article outlines specific product development and regulatory considerations for advancing safe and effective in vivo and ex vivo genome editing medicines.
Emphasizes tailored regulatory pathways for genome editing; leaves open optimal strategies for safe clinical translation.
Therapeutic genome editing is currently reshaping and transforming the development of advanced therapies as more ex vivo and in vivo gene editing-based technologies are used to treat a broad range of debilitating and complex disorders. With first-generation gene editing modalities (notably those based on ZFNs, TALENs and CRISPR/Cas9), comes a new second-generation of gene editing-based therapeutics including base editing, prime editing and other nuclease-free genome editing modalities. Such ground-breaking innovative products warrant careful considerations from a product development and regulatory perspective, that take into account not only the common development considerations that apply to standard gene and cell therapy products, but also other specific considerations linked with the technology being used. This article sheds light into specific considerations for developing safe and effective in vivo and ex vivo genome editing medicines that will continue to push barriers even further for the cell and gene therapy field.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Houria Bachtarzi (2023) conducted a review in debilitating and complex disorders. Therapeutic genome editing was evaluated. Therapeutic genome editing modalities require specific product development and regulatory considerations to ensure the advancement of safe and effective in vivo and ex vivo medicines.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: