Key result
~67% of specialists report growing anesthesia involvement in EP cases, driving higher patient satisfaction.
Why the study?
There has been a dramatic shift in anesthesia coverage for electrophysiology procedures, and current practice patterns and perceived variability needed documentation.
Cross-Sectional (n=479)
Yes
Survey results indicate a growing trend of anesthesia involvement in electrophysiology procedures, which is associated with increased perceived patient satisfaction.
May support expanded anesthesia involvement in electrophysiology; leaves open prospective validation of outcomes.
BACKGROUND: There has been a dramatic shift in recent years in anesthesia coverage for electrophysiology (EP) procedures. An anesthesiologist and electrophysiologist at our institution jointly developed a survey, which was distributed to the Society of Cardiovascular Anesthesiologists and the Heart Rhythm Society. Its goal was to document current practice patterns and examine perceived variability in coverage. METHODS: On approval of the leadership from the Society of Cardiovascular Anesthesiologists and the Heart Rhythm Society, an online survey was administered to the membership. The survey included demographic data, anesthetic type, and perceptions of the respondents. RESULTS: Four hundred seventy-nine surveys were completed. Thirty-eight percent were completed by electrophysiologists and 63% by anesthesiologists, giving a response rate of 8.24% for anesthesiologists and 13.6% for electrophysiologists. Of these, 57% of respondents worked in an academic setting. Over the past 2 years, 66.5% of respondents reported anesthesia involvement in EP cases increasing. These cases are reportedly covered by all anesthesiologists in a group 55% of the time, cardiac anesthesia 32.5%, and a designated team at the remainder of the institutions. Seventy-six percent of respondents reported having designated EP block time in the schedule. Ninety-two percent of respondents reported that patient satisfaction has increased with the involvement of anesthesia services. CONCLUSIONS: Anesthesia coverage for EP procedures has continued to increase with an increase in patient satisfaction. Anesthesiologists have had to adapt and provide designated block time to accommodate this increase and also, in some instances, form teams that go beyond simply cardiac anesthesiologists to care for these patients during their procedures.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Nelson et al. (2018) conducted a cross-sectional in Anesthesia coverage for electrophysiology procedures (n=479). Anesthesia involvement in electrophysiology procedures was evaluated on Reported increase in anesthesia involvement in EP cases over the past 2 years. A survey of 479 specialists revealed that 66.5% reported an increase in anesthesia involvement in electrophysiology cases over the past 2 years, with 92% noting increased patient satisfaction.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: