Key result
Conscious sedation during AF cryoballoon ablation proves safe and achieves ~96% acute procedural success.
Why the study?
General anesthesia during cryoballoon ablation for atrial fibrillation may negatively impact mortality, morbidity, and procedure costs, prompting assessment of conscious sedation feasibility and safety.
Does conscious sedation provide safe and feasible conditions for patients undergoing cryoballoon ablation for atrial fibrillation?
Observational (n=71)
No
Does conscious sedation provide safe and feasible conditions for patients undergoing cryoballoon ablation for atrial fibrillation?
Conscious sedation using midazolam and fentanyl is a feasible and safe alternative to general anesthesia for patients undergoing cryoballoon ablation for atrial fibrillation, achieving high acute procedural success.
Conscious sedation may be feasible in selected cryoballoon AF cases; retrospective data leave open need for randomized comparison to general anesthesia.
BACKGROUND: Cryoballoon ablation for atrial fibrillation (cryoAF) is relatively simple, cost-effective and easy procedure. However, general anesthesia during this procedure may have negative impact on patients' mortality and morbidity, as well as procedure costs. We sought to assess the feasibility and safety of conscious sedation during cryoAF. METHODS: Patients with paroxysmal or persistent, drug-refractory AF who underwent a first procedure of cryoAF were included in our single-center, retrospective study. The loading dose of midazolam was 2 mg and loading fentanyl dose was 25 µg intravenously. Additional doses of midazolam and fentanyl were administered, if necessary. Midazolam and fentanyl were administered to maintain amnesia and analgesia, and patients' responsiveness in Ramsay Sedation Score was assessed every 10 minutes with sedation kept at the Ramsey Sedation Scale not exceeding Ramsey 3 Grade. RESULTS: A total of 71 patients with mean age 59.5±11.1 years were enrolled (48 males, 68%). The TEE and the TEE-guided transseptal puncture was feasible in all patients. The mean duration of cryoAF procedure was 136.3±36.0 minutes. The overall mean midazolam and fentanyl used doses were: 5.1±3.1 mg (55.7±35.1 µg/kg) and 98.9±51.1 µg (1.13±0.60 µg/kg). In 3 patients (4.2%), vascular complications occurred (femoral vein bleeding with hematoma formation without communication with femoral artery). In 1 case (1.4%) transient right phrenic palsy was observed; symptoms disappeared completely within 12 hours after procedure. The overall acute procedural success rate of cryoAF (defined as electrical isolation of all pulmonary veins) was 68/71 (95.8%). CONCLUSIONS: Conscious sedation is a safe, efficacious and feasible during cryoablation of pulmonary veins for AF.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Miśkowiec et al. (2018) conducted an observational in paroxysmal or persistent, drug-refractory atrial fibrillation (n=71). Conscious sedation (midazolam and fentanyl) was evaluated on Acute procedural success rate (defined as electrical isolation of all pulmonary veins). Conscious sedation during cryoballoon ablation for atrial fibrillation was feasible and safe, achieving an acute procedural success rate of 95.8%.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: