Key result
Proton beam therapy yields ~0.2% lower predicted 30-year CVD mortality risk versus photon therapy.
Why the study?
Proton beam therapy may reduce radiation-related cardiovascular disease and second cancer risks compared with photon radiation therapy in Hodgkin lymphoma patients, but identifying which patients benefit most is needed.
Does proton beam therapy reduce predicted 30-year absolute mortality risks from cardiovascular disease and second cancers compared with photon radiation therapy in patients with supradiaphragmatic Hodgkin lymphoma?
Observational (n=80)
Does proton beam therapy reduce predicted 30-year absolute mortality risks from cardiovascular disease and second cancers compared with photon radiation therapy in patients with supradiaphragmatic Hodgkin lymphoma?
Absolute Risk Reduction: 0.2
Absolute Event Rate: 5.7% vs 5.9%
Absolute Risk Reduction: 0.2%
Proton beam therapy offers modest predicted reductions in 30-year cardiovascular and second cancer mortality risks compared to photon therapy, primarily benefiting patients with lower mediastinal or axillary disease.
Small modeled risk reduction does not support routine proton adoption; leaves open need for prospective outcome trials in lymphoma survivors.
Purpose In some patients with Hodgkin lymphoma (HL), proton beam therapy (PBT) may reduce the risk of radiation-related cardiovascular disease (CVD) and second cancers (SC) compared with photon radiation therapy (RT). Our aim was to identify patients who benefit the most from PBT in terms of predicted 30-year absolute mortality risks (AMR 30 ) from CVD and SC, taking into account individual background, chemotherapy, radiation, and smoking-related risks. Methods and Materials Eighty patients with supradiaphragmatic HL treated with PBT between 2015 and 2019 were replanned using optimal photon RT. To identify patients predicted to derive the greatest benefit from PBT compared with photon RT, doses and AMR 30 from CVD and SC of the lung, breast, and esophagus were compared for all patients and across patient subgroups. Results For patients with mediastinal disease below the origin of the left main coronary artery (n = 66; 82%), PBT reduced the mean dose to the heart, left ventricle, and heart valves by 1.0, 2.7, and 3.6 Gy, respectively. Based on U.S. mortality rates, PBT reduced CVD AMR 30 by 0.2%, from 5.9% to 5.7%. The benefit was larger if the mediastinal disease overlapped longitudinally with the heart by ≥40% (n = 23; 29%). PBT reduced the mean dose to the heart, left ventricle, and heart valves by 3.2, 5.6, and 5.1 Gy, respectively, and reduced CVD AMR 30 by 0.8%, from 7.0% to 6.2%. For patients with axillary disease (n = 25; 31%), PBT reduced the mean lung dose by 2.8 Gy and lung cancer AMR 30 by 0.6%, from 2.7% to 2.1%. Breast and esophageal doses were also lower with PBT, but the effects on AMR 30 were negligible. The effect of smoking on CVD and lung cancer AMR 30 was much larger than radiation and chemotherapy and the differences between radiation modalities. Conclusions The predicted benefit of PBT is not universal and limited to certain categories of patients with lymphoma and lower mediastinal or axillary disease. Smoking cessation should be strongly encouraged in smokers who require thoracic RT.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ntentas et al. (2021) conducted an observational in Supradiaphragmatic Hodgkin lymphoma (n=80). Proton beam therapy vs. Optimal photon radiation therapy was evaluated on Predicted 30-year absolute mortality risk from cardiovascular disease (in patients with mediastinal disease below the left main coronary artery). Proton beam therapy reduced predicted 30-year cardiovascular mortality risk by 0.2% (from 5.9% to 5.7%) compared with photon radiation therapy in patients with supradiaphragmatic Hodgkin lymphoma.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: