Key result
Etoricoxib shows no difference in thrombotic cardiovascular risk versus placebo or traditional NSAIDs.
Why the study?
A pooled analysis was needed to compare thrombotic cardiovascular event rates in patients taking etoricoxib versus traditional NSAIDs or placebo across multiple clinical trials.
Does etoricoxib increase the risk of thrombotic cardiovascular events compared to traditional NSAIDs or placebo in patients with arthritis or chronic low back pain?
Meta-Analysis
Randomized
Does etoricoxib increase the risk of thrombotic cardiovascular events compared to traditional NSAIDs or placebo in patients with arthritis or chronic low back pain?
Relative Risk: 1.11 (95% CI 0.32–3.81)
In a pooled analysis, etoricoxib showed no significant difference in thrombotic cardiovascular events compared to placebo or non-naproxen NSAIDs, though a trend toward increased risk was observed compared to naproxen.
No clear thrombotic difference versus non-naproxen NSAIDs in limited data; leaves open naproxen comparator questions for larger trials.
BACKGROUND: A pooled analysis of randomized clinical trials data was performed to compare the rate of thrombotic cardiovascular events (thrombotic events) in patients taking the COX-2 selective inhibitor (coxib) etoricoxib, a traditional NSAID, or placebo. METHODS: Data collected during all phase IIb/III etoricoxib clinical trials > or = 4 weeks in duration were evaluated. The pooled data set includes clinical information from approximately 6500 patient-years (PYs) of drug exposure in patients diagnosed with rheumatoid arthritis (RA), osteoarthritis (OA), ankylosing spondylitis (AS), or chronic low back pain (CLBP). Patients were treated with either etoricoxib (> or = 60 mg/day), the traditional NSAIDs naproxen (1000 mg/day), ibuprofen (2400 mg/day), diclofenac (150 mg/day), or placebo. The Relative risks (RRs) based on time to first occurrence of a thrombotic event in the etoricoxib group versus the comparator traditional NSAIDs or versus placebo were determined using patient-level data. RESULTS: In the pooled dataset, a total of 74 thrombotic events occurred in 69 patients. The RRs for thrombotic events were 1.11 (95%CI: 0.32, 3.81) for etoricoxib (N = 2818) versus placebo (N = 1767); 0.83 (95%CI: 0.26, 2.64) for etoricoxib (N = 1266) versus the combined non-naproxen traditional NSAID group (ibuprofen and diclofenac; N = 718); and 1.70 (95%CI: 0.91, 3.18) for etoricoxib (N = 1960) versus naproxen (N = 1497). CONCLUSIONS: There was no discernible difference in the incidence of thrombotic events in patients treated with etoricoxib versus non-naproxen traditional NSAIDs in this limited dataset. A trend toward more events with etoricoxib versus naproxen was observed. Despite the limited dataset available for this pooled analysis, these results are consistent with findings for other coxibs.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Curtis et al. (2006) conducted a meta-analysis in Rheumatoid arthritis, osteoarthritis, ankylosing spondylitis, or chronic low back pain. Etoricoxib vs. Placebo, naproxen (1000 mg/day), ibuprofen (2400 mg/day), or diclofenac (150 mg/day) was evaluated on Time to first occurrence of a thrombotic cardiovascular event (RR 1.11, 95% CI 0.32, 3.81). Etoricoxib showed no significant difference in the risk of thrombotic cardiovascular events compared to placebo (RR 1.11; 95% CI 0.32-3.81) or non-naproxen traditional NSAIDs.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: