Key result
Pericardiocentesis is linked to pericardial decompression syndrome with ventricular dysfunction and shock.
Why the study?
Ventricular dysfunction and cardiogenic shock following pericardiocentesis in patients with pericardial effusions are underrecognized and require improved monitoring strategies.
Case Report (n=3)
No
This case series highlights the risk of pericardial decompression syndrome following pericardiocentesis and proposes a novel intra-pericardial pressure monitoring protocol to prevent it.
Cardiac tamponade is a medical emergency requiring prompt recognition and intervention to avoid potentially fatal consequences. We present a case series of ventricular dysfunction and cardiogenic shock following pericardiocentesis in 3 patients with pericardial effusions at The Ottawa Hospital between 2014 and 2020. This report highlights the need for monitoring post-pericardiocentesis and raises awareness of this phenomenon, particularly in patients with malignancy. We propose a novel pressure-monitoring protocol to guide drainage and prevent development of pericardial decompression syndrome. The novel teaching points include limiting drainage to prevent development of pericardial decompression syndrome and a protocol for intra-pericardial pressure monitoring.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Thabet et al. (2021) conducted a case report in Pericardial effusions (n=3). Pericardiocentesis was evaluated on Ventricular dysfunction and cardiogenic shock. Pericardiocentesis in 3 patients with pericardial effusions led to pericardial decompression syndrome, characterized by ventricular dysfunction and cardiogenic shock.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: