Key result
EVAR linked to a ~100% increase in circulating EPCs, matching levels of healthy controls.
Why the study?
The correlation between circulating endothelial progenitor cells and abdominal aortic aneurysms was not well understood.
Does endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) increase circulating endothelial progenitor cell levels in patients with abdominal aortic aneurysms?
Observational (n=14)
No
Does endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) increase circulating endothelial progenitor cell levels in patients with abdominal aortic aneurysms?
p-value: p=<0.05
Circulating EPC levels are reduced in AAA patients and rise significantly after EVAR, suggesting a role in vascular repair and potential utility as a biomarker for monitoring.
Background and Objectives: Circulating endothelial progenitor cells (EPCs) participate in vascular repair and predict cardiovascular outcomes. The aim of this study was to investigate the correlation between EPCs and abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs). Methods and Results: ) in the peripheral blood were significantly smaller in AAA patients compared with control subjects. The number of EPCs doubled by the 14th day after EVAR. A total of 78.57% of rats in the PPE group (11/14) formed AAAs (dilation ratio >150%). The numbers of EPCs from defined AAA rats were significantly decreased compared with the control group. Conclusions: EPC levels may be useful for monitoring abdominal aorta aneurysms and rise after EVAR in patients with aortic aneurysms, and might contribute to the rapid endothelialization of vessels.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wu et al. (2021) conducted an observational in Abdominal aortic aneurysms (n=14). Endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) vs. Preoperative baseline was evaluated on Circulating CD34+/CD309+ endothelial progenitor cell levels (p=<0.05). Endovascular aneurysm repair doubled the number of circulating CD34+/CD309+ endothelial progenitor cells by 14 days post-surgery, returning them to levels comparable to age-matched controls.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: