Key result
Larger maximum AAA diameter is linked to higher MACCE risk after EVAR.
Why the study?
Major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events following EVAR for AAAs are serious outcomes, but their incidence and predictive factors needed evaluation.
Cohort (n=1,090)
No
p-value: p=.002
In patients undergoing EVAR for infrarenal AAAs, larger maximum aneurysm diameter is an independent predictor of long-term major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events, suggesting a need for closer cardiovascular surveillance.
BACKGROUND: Major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events (MACCE) following endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) for abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs) are serious outcomes. The primary aim of this study was to evaluate the incidence of MACCE after EVAR and to investigate the relevant predictive factors for MACCE. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This single-center retrospective cohort study included patients who were diagnosed with infrarenal AAAs and who underwent EVAR from February 2012 to February 2022. The cumulative incidence of MACCE after EVAR in this study was assessed via a competing-risk model. RESULTS: = .002). During a median follow-up of 42 months, 323 patients experienced at least 1 MACCE, whereas 767 patients did not experience MACCE. The cumulative risks of MACCE excluding noncardiovascular/noncerebrovascular mortality at 12, 36, and 60 months after EVAR were 5.4%, 9.1%, and 19.0%, respectively. CONCLUSION: The cumulative incidence of MACCE after EVAR for AAAs is relatively high, and the maximum diameter of the AAAs is a predictor of MACCE.Clinical ImpactMajor adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events remain an important long-term concern after EVAR. In this large retrospective cohort, approximately one in five patients experienced MACCE within 5 years, after accounting for competing noncardiovascular/noncerebrovascular mortality. Importantly, larger maximum AAA diameter was independently associated with a higher risk of subsequent MACCE. These findings suggest that aneurysm diameter may provide additional information for cardiovascular risk stratification beyond its established role in determining aneurysm-related treatment. Patients with larger AAAs may therefore warrant closer cardiovascular surveillance and more intensive management of modifiable risk factors after EVAR.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Qi et al. (2026) conducted a cohort in Infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysms (n=1,090). Maximum abdominal aortic aneurysm diameter was evaluated on Major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events (MACCE) (p=.002). Larger maximum abdominal aortic aneurysm diameter was independently associated with a higher risk of major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events after endovascular aneurysm repair (P=.002).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: