Key result
Endovascular abdominal aneurysm repair demonstrated a perioperative mortality rate of 1.4% and an overall complication-free rate of 66.7%.
Why the study?
The objective was to estimate the perioperative mortality and long-term outcome of endovascular abdominal aneurysm repair (EVAR).
Observational (n=222)
No
EVAR performed in a single-center setting demonstrates a low perioperative mortality of 1.4% and an acceptable complication rate, primarily driven by Type II endoleaks that are mostly managed conservatively.
Low perioperative mortality supports EVAR safety in experienced centers; leaves open generalizability and long-term durability versus RCTs.
Background Abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) is a dangerous disorder characterised by abnormal enlargement of the abdominal aorta. The severity of the aneurysm and the presence of symptoms determine the necessary monitoring or treatment to prevent potential fatalities. The objective of this study is to estimate the perioperative mortality and long-term outcome of endovascular abdominal aneurysm repair (EVAR). Patients and methods This is a descriptive, retrospective, observational study. We retrieved the data of the AAA patients who underwent EVAR at Glan Clwyd Hospital from January 2015 to January 2023. The study sample consisted of patients diagnosed with isolated AAA, with or without iliac branch involvement, who were deemed suitable for EVAR based on factors such as advanced age, presence of comorbidities, the complexity of the condition, history of prior surgery, fulfillment of indication criteria, and patient desire. The data was analysed using SPSS statistical software, version 21.0 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY). Results Two hundred and twenty-two patients were studied. The outcome of the EVAR among the patients was endo-leak 28.4% (n = 63); migration 1.4% (n = 3); blockage 0.5% (n = 1); infolding 0.5% (n = 1); perioperative mortality 1.4% (3); and other complications like access site or acute kidney injury were 1.4% (n = 3). However, no complications were reported in most of the patients, 66.7% (n = 148). Upon evaluating the variables that could affect the outcome, we observed that the ASA grade, comorbidities, and the indication of the intervention had a significant effect on the outcome (P values = 0.000, 0.048, and 0.014, respectively). Conclusion The findings demonstrate that when EVAR is performed by a skilled team adhering to proper criteria, the results are optimal. The mortality rate during the perioperative period was 1.4%. Furthermore, we have shown a satisfactory rate of complications when compared to international data.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Elshikhawoda et al. (2023) conducted an observational in Abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) (n=222). Endovascular Abdominal Aneurysm Repair (EVAR) was evaluated on Perioperative mortality. Endovascular abdominal aneurysm repair demonstrated a perioperative mortality rate of 1.4% and an overall complication-free rate of 66.7%.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: