Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the short-term efficacy of tamsulosin treatment for patients with lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) suggestive of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) according to baseline prostate volume (PV). METHODS: Tamsulosin, 0.2 mg/day, was prospectively given to 112 patients aged 50 years or older who had International Prostate Symptom Scores (IPSS) ≥ 8. The short-term efficacy was analyzed using the IPSS, quality of life (QOL) index, BPH problem index (BPI), maximum flow rate (Qmax ) and postvoid residual urine volume (PVR) at 4 weeks and 3 months after treatment considering the estimated PV at baseline. RESULTS: Of the 112 patients, 81 and 31 had PV of < 35 and ≥ 35 mL, respectively. The IPSS was significantly improved in patients with PV of < 35 mL (17.8 ± 5.9 at baseline, 13.5 ± 7.0 at 4 weeks, 11.9 ± 6.1 at 3 months) and in those with PV of ≥ 35 mL (17.4 ± 6.7 at baseline, 13.1 ± 7.0 at 4 weeks, 13.4 ± 6.2 at 3 months). There was no significant difference in the changes of the IPSS between the groups in a combined analysis model (P = 0.559). In addition, the model revealed no significant differences in changes in the QOL index, BPI, Qmax and PVR. CONCLUSION: The short-term efficacy of tamsulosin is observed irrespective of baseline PV. Thus, α1-blocker monotherapy should be considered for all patients with BPH/LUTS to rapidly relieve symptoms, although the long-term outcome is not promising for patients with a large PV at baseline.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Masumori et al. (2013) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: