Key result
Milnacipran shows no difference in serious CV event risk versus venlafaxine or amitriptyline.
Why the study?
The cardiovascular risk associated with milnacipran compared with venlafaxine and amitriptyline in patients treated for depression or fibromyalgia was uncertain.
Does milnacipran increase the risk of serious cardiovascular events compared to venlafaxine or amitriptyline in patients without prior cardiovascular events?
Cohort (n=16,426)
Does milnacipran increase the risk of serious cardiovascular events compared to venlafaxine or amitriptyline in patients without prior cardiovascular events?
Relative Risk: 1.29 (95% CI 0.76–2.17)
In a French population-based cohort, milnacipran did not carry a significantly different risk of serious cardiovascular events compared to venlafaxine or amitriptyline.
Similar CV event rates with milnacipran versus comparators support comparable short-term safety; leaves open need for prospective confirmation.
BACKGROUND: Milnacipran, a selective serotonin and norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor, is approved by the Food and Drug Administration for the management of fibromyalgia. It has been available for many years in several countries outside the US for the treatment of depression. OBJECTIVE: To conduct population-based analyses comparing the risk of serious cardiovascular (CV) events (eg, acute myocardial infarction, stroke, congestive heart failure) associated with treatment with milnacipran compared with venlafaxine and amitriptyline, 2 other commonly prescribed drugs that also inhibit reuptake of norepinephrine and serotonin. METHODS: Information from the French Thales electronic health record database from 2001 to 2007 was used. Patients with 1 or more prescriptions for milnacipran, venlafaxine, or amitriptyline; 180 or more days of continuous eligibility prior to the first prescription; and no prior CV event diagnoses during the 180-day baseline period were included. A retrospective, matched-cohort design was employed. The incidence rates of CV events between cohorts receiving milnacipran, venlafaxine, and amitriptyline were compared using unadjusted incidence rate ratio (IRR) and adjusted conditional IRR based on Poisson regression. RESULTS: We identified 4452 milnacipran-venlafaxine and 3761 milnacipran-amitriptyline matched pairs. The matched cohorts had similar baseline characteristics. The unadjusted IRRs of any CV events, comparing milnacipran with venlafaxine or amitriptyline, were 1.02 (95% CI 0.73 to 1.44) and 1.30 (95% CI 0.90 to 1.89), respectively. Adjusted IRRs confirmed the statistical similarity in the CV event risk between milnacipran and venlafaxine (adjusted IRR = 1.29, 95% CI 0.76 to 2.17) or amitriptyline (adjusted IRR = 1.06, 95% CI 0.59 to 1.89). CONCLUSIONS: This French population-based study found that the risk of CV events was not significantly different for patients receiving milnacipran versus those receiving venlafaxine or amitriptyline.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mease et al. (2011) conducted a cohort in Patients receiving milnacipran, venlafaxine, or amitriptyline (n=16,426). Milnacipran vs. Venlafaxine or amitriptyline was evaluated on Serious cardiovascular events (e.g., acute myocardial infarction, stroke, congestive heart failure) (adjusted IRR 1.29, 95% CI 0.76 to 2.17). Milnacipran exposure was not associated with a significantly different risk of serious cardiovascular events compared with venlafaxine (adjusted IRR 1.29; 95% CI 0.76-2.17) or amitriptyline.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: