Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
On the basis of a study of the partisan transition in the U.S. Senate following the 1980 elections, several explanations for divided control of Congress are considered, and strategic consequences of the division are explored. Attempted internal changes in such areas as scheduling, committee coordination, and staffing are described. Partisan transitions-a rarity in the modem Congress-are a reminder of what control of a chamber means to a party. The absence of major internal changes following this transition suggests the extent to which the contemporary Senate has become institutionalized.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Davidson et al. (1984) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: