Key result
Virtual Active Brains-Fitbit program demonstrates high early feasibility with ~92% session completion in pilot RCT.
Why the study?
Chronic pain and cognitive decline are prevalent, costly, and challenging to treat in older adults, and their interaction worsens outcomes over time, necessitating novel interventions.
Does the virtual Active Brains-Fitbit program demonstrate feasibility and acceptability in older adults with chronic pain and cognitive decline?
RCT (n=21)
Single-blind
randomized
Does the virtual Active Brains-Fitbit program demonstrate feasibility and acceptability in older adults with chronic pain and cognitive decline?
A completely virtual mind-body activity program shows preliminary feasibility and high attendance in older adults with comorbid chronic pain and cognitive decline.
Supports scalable virtual mind-body programs for older adults with pain and cognitive decline; extends pilot data toward larger efficacy trials.
BACKGROUND Chronic pain (CP) and cognitive decline (CD) are costly, challenging to treat, prevalent among older adults, and worsen each other over time. We are iteratively developing Active Brains-Fitbit (AB-F), a live video program for older adults with CP and CD that teaches mind-body skills and gradual increases in step count. AB-F has demonstrated feasibility; acceptability; and signs of improvement in emotional, physical, and cognitive functions when delivered in person to older adults. OBJECTIVE We are conducting a feasibility randomized controlled trial (RCT) of AB-F versus a time- and dose-matched educational control (health enhancement program [HEP]) in older adults with CP and CD. Here, we describe virtual adaptions to our study protocol, manualized treatments, evaluation plan, and study design in response to feedback from former participants and COVID-19. We will evaluate the feasibility benchmarks and the potential of AB-F to improve physical, emotional, and cognitive functions. METHODS This is a single-blind pilot RCT. Participants are randomized to AB-F or HEP. Patients are recruited through pain clinic referrals, institutional registries, and flyers. Interested participants are screened for eligibility via telephone and provide electronic informed consent. After randomization, participants are mailed all study documents, including their treatment manual, an ActiGraph accelerometer, and a Fitbit (separate envelope for AB-F only). Both conditions are manualized and delivered over 8 weekly sessions via Zoom. Participants complete self-report and performance-based (6-min walk test and Montreal Cognitive Assessment) outcome measures via Zoom at baseline and post intervention. Primary outcomes are a priori set feasibility (recruitment, quantitative measures, and adherence), acceptability, credibility, expectancy, and satisfaction benchmarks. Secondary outcomes are physical, cognitive, and emotional functions as well as intervention targets (social function, pain intensity, pain-specific coping, and mindfulness). RESULTS The trial is ongoing. We have recruited 21 participants (10 AB-F and 11 HEP) across 2 rounds. Only 2 participants have withdrawn (1 before baseline and 1 before the first session). All 19 remaining participants have completed the baseline assessment. In the first round, attendance is high (11 out of 12 participants completed all 4 sessions so far), and AB-F participants are adherent to their Fitbit and step goals (5 out of 6 participants). CONCLUSIONS Preliminary findings are promising for the feasibility of our completely virtual AB-F intervention. However, these findings need to be confirmed at the trial conclusion. This study will answer important questions about the feasibility of delivering a completely virtual mind-body activity program to older adults with comorbid CP and CD, which, to our knowledge, is unprecedented. Details on integrating multiple digital platforms for virtual assessments and intervention delivery will inform treatment development for older adults and those with comorbid CP and CD, which is crucial during the COVID-19 pandemic. CLINICALTRIAL ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04044183; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04044183 INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT DERR1-10.2196/25351
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mace et al. (2020) conducted an RCT in Chronic pain and cognitive decline (n=21). Active Brains-Fitbit (AB-F) vs. Health enhancement program (HEP) was evaluated on Feasibility (recruitment, quantitative measures, and adherence), acceptability, credibility, expectancy, and satisfaction benchmarks. The virtual Active Brains-Fitbit program showed promising early feasibility in an ongoing pilot RCT, with 21 participants recruited and 11 of 12 first-round participants completing all 4 sessions.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: