Key result
Agentic AI ECG model classifies LVDD severity with ~0.87 AUC and stratifies incident HF mortality.
Why the study?
Left ventricular diastolic dysfunction assessment relies on multiparametric echocardiography, limiting scalability and broader access to diastolic function evaluation.
Does an agentic AI-based model using surface ECG accurately assess left ventricular diastolic dysfunction and predict incident heart failure mortality compared to echocardiography?
Observational (n=257,279)
Yes
Does an agentic AI-based model using surface ECG accurately assess left ventricular diastolic dysfunction and predict incident heart failure mortality compared to echocardiography?
Agentic AI-based auto-discovery models can accurately assess left ventricular diastolic dysfunction and predict incident heart failure mortality using standard surface ECGs.
Agentic AI may accelerate ECG-based LVDD screening; leaves open validation and outcome impact in prospective studies.
Background: Left ventricular diastolic dysfunction (LVDD) is a major determinant of heart failure (HF), yet its assessment relies on multiparametric echocardiography, limiting scalability. We previously demonstrated that generative artificial intelligence (AI) can synthesize tissue Doppler imaging (TDI) waveforms from the 12-lead ECG. The growing complexity of candidate architecture creates a need for automated model-discovery frameworks. Objectives: To evaluate agentic AI-based auto-discovery for ECG-based LVDD assessment using either raw ECG or synthetic TDI waveforms. Methods: Two attention-based agentic AI architectures were developed using an automated large language model-driven refinement framework that optimized transfer-learning and multimodal architectures through autonomous proposal, validation, and selection of candidate model configurations. Development was performed in 1,011 paired ECG-echocardiography studies and externally validated in 983 patients using two reference frameworks: (i) data-driven phenogroups and (ii) the 2025 ASE Diastolic Function Guidelines. External validation was performed in CODE-15% (n=219,567) for HF-related mortality and EchoNext (n=35,718) for structural heart disease associations. Results: Despite the modest cohort size, the ECG-based agentic search achieved area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUCs) of 0.87 (95% CI: 0.85-0.89) and 0.83 (95% CI: 0.80-0.86) for phenogroup and guideline-based LVDD severity classification. Corresponding AUCs for the synthetic TDI-based model were 0.82 (95% CI: 0.80-0.85) and 0.80 (95% CI: 0.77-0.84), respectively. In large-scale external validation, both models stratified incident HF mortality with subdistribution hazard ratios ranging 5.5 to 9.5 (Gray's p<0.001 for all). Time-dependent discrimination for incident HF mortality exceeded a publicly available convolutional neural network model (ECG2HF) (ΔAUC range: +0.14 to +0.20). Both models demonstrated consistent associations with structural heart disease outcomes. Conclusions: Agentic auto-discovery enabled data-efficient assessment of LVDD from surface ECG by combining physiologically informed transfer learning with autonomous architecture optimization, achieving robust external generalizability. This approach may facilitate broader access to diastolic function assessment beyond conventional echocardiography.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jamthikar et al. (2026) conducted an observational in Left ventricular diastolic dysfunction (n=257,279). Agentic AI-based ECG model vs. ECG2HF model was evaluated on Phenogroup-based LVDD severity classification (AUC 0.87, 95% CI 0.85-0.89). An agentic AI-based ECG model accurately classified left ventricular diastolic dysfunction severity (AUC 0.87; 95% CI 0.85-0.89) and stratified incident heart failure mortality.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: