Key result
TAVR with the Myval device achieves ~95% technical success in non-calcified AR.
Why the study?
Transcatheter aortic valve replacement in non-calcified aortic regurgitation is an off-label procedure with limited data on safety and feasibility using the Myval balloon-expandable valve.
Is TAVR with the Myval balloon-expandable valve safe and feasible in patients with symptomatic severe non-calcified aortic regurgitation?
Observational
Yes
Is TAVR with the Myval balloon-expandable valve safe and feasible in patients with symptomatic severe non-calcified aortic regurgitation?
The Myval balloon-expandable valve demonstrates high technical success and acceptable midterm safety for the off-label treatment of severe non-calcified aortic regurgitation in selected non-operable patients.
Supports Myval TAVR feasibility in non-calcified AR; hypothesis-generating and requires randomized confirmation before practice change.
BACKGROUND: Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) in non-calcified aortic regurgitation (NCAR) is an off-label procedure. The balloon-expandable Myval includes extra-large sizes (30.5 mm and 32 mm) of interest in this setting. AIMS: We aimed to evaluate the safety and feasibility of Myval in NCAR. METHODS: This was an international, multicentre, observational study that enrolled all consecutive patients with symptomatic severe NCAR undergoing TAVR with the Myval device. The images were centrally analysed. RESULTS: . The annular area was beyond the recommended range for extra-large sizes in 2.6% of cases, and additional volume was added in 92% (median 4 cc, up to 9 cc). The extra-large sizes were used in 95 patients (84.1%), and the mean oversizing was 17.9±11.0%. The technical success rate was 94.7%; the rate of residual ≥moderate aortic regurgitation was 8.9%, and the pacemaker rate was 22.2%. There were no cases of annular rupture, cardiac tamponade, or aortic dissection, but in 4 patients (3.5%) valve embolisation occurred (1 antegrade and 3 ventricular), all in cases with a tapered left ventricle outflow tract (p=0.007). Thirty-day and 1-year mortality were 5.3% and 9.7%, respectively. Technical success was associated with better survival (97.1% vs 72.7%; p=0.012), and valve embolisation was the main determinant of mortality (p=0.047). CONCLUSIONS: Myval is a feasible and safe option for selected non-operable patients with NCAR and demonstrated good midterm outcomes and lack of impact of oversizing on device durability.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sánchez-Luna et al. (2023) conducted an observational in Symptomatic severe non-calcified aortic regurgitation. TAVR with the Myval balloon-expandable valve was evaluated on Technical success. TAVR with the Myval device in non-calcified aortic regurgitation demonstrated a 94.7% technical success rate, with 30-day and 1-year mortality of 5.3% and 9.7%, respectively.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: