Key result
Office measurements overestimate morning systolic BP by ~16 mmHg versus ABPM in CKD patients.
Why the study?
The reliability of office assessed blood pressure compared to ambulatory blood pressure monitoring in CKD patients and kidney transplant recipients was yet to be determined.
Does office assessed blood pressure differ from 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure monitoring in chronic kidney disease patients and kidney transplant recipients?
Observational (n=45)
No
Does office assessed blood pressure differ from 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure monitoring in chronic kidney disease patients and kidney transplant recipients?
Absolute Event Rate: 141.7% vs 125.6%
p-value: p=0.0003
Office blood pressure monitoring tends to overestimate blood pressure compared to 24-hour ambulatory monitoring in patients with chronic kidney disease, highlighting the need for ABPM for accurate diagnosis.
Office BP overestimates versus ABPM in CKD and KTx patients; leaves open whether routine ABPM should guide management.
How reliable is office assessed blood pressure (BP) in chronic kidney disease (CKD) patients and kidney transplant (KTx) recipients is yet to be determined, although the diagnosis of arterial hypertension has been based on these measurements. The aim of this study was to investigate the potential differences between office assessed BP and ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) in CKD patients and KTx recipients. We conducted a prospective study which enrolled 45 patients. Morning and evening seated office BPs were assessed using a sphygmomanometer at 5 consecutive outpatient visits. A mean systolic BP (SBP) and diastolic BP (DBP) was calculated. Ambulatory blood pressure was measured over 24 hours using a Meditech ABPM-05 device. Office SBP was statistically significant higher in CKD patients than KTx recipients both in the morning and evening (p=0.0433 and p=0.0066 respectively). ABPM showed higher night-time SBPs (p=0.0445) and higher overall, day-time and night-time DBPs in KTX recipients (p=0.0001, p=0.0006, p<0.0001 respectively). In CKD patients, office SBPs and DBPs are significantly higher than overall SBPs and DBPs as assessed by 24hr ABPM. Office BP monitoring as assessed by clinician is acceptable but tends to overestimate BP in both CKD and KTx study groups.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tarta et al. (2015) conducted an observational in Chronic Kidney Disease and Kidney Transplant (n=45). Office blood pressure measurement vs. 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure monitoring was evaluated on Morning systolic blood pressure in chronic kidney disease patients (p=0.0003). Office measurements significantly overestimated morning systolic blood pressure compared to 24-hour ambulatory monitoring in chronic kidney disease patients (141.7 vs 125.6 mmHg, p=0.0003).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: