Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
BACKGROUND: Although cyclosporine maintenance therapy reduces the risk of acute rejection and increases short-term graft survival in renal transplant recipients, its associated nephrotoxicity increases the risk of chronic graft dysfunction. The dose that allows an optimal risk-to-benefit ratio has not been established. METHODS: This multicentre study enrolled stable renal allograft recipients receiving cyclosporine and mycophenolate mofetil without corticosteroids in their second year post-transplant. Patients were randomized to a cyclosporine dose targeted to a standard area under the concentration-time curve (AUC)(0-12 h) (usual exposure, n = 104) or 50% of the study standard AUC(0-12 h) (low exposure, n = 108) using a three-point pharmacokinetic sampling. The primary endpoint was the percentage of patients with treatment failure at 24 months (graft loss/acute rejection/nephrotoxicity/>15% serum creatinine level increase). RESULTS: Treatment failure was reported in 37 out of 101 (37%) patients in the usual-exposure and 19 out of 106 (18%) patients in the low-exposure groups (P = 0.003). Mean estimated glomerular filtration rate decreased from baseline to 2 years with usual exposure and increased with low exposure (P < 0.001). Mean systolic and diastolic blood pressures were lower with low exposure (P = 0.03 and P = 0.008, respectively). CONCLUSION: In renal transplant recipients receiving maintenance therapy without corticosteroids, a minimization strategy using three-point pharmacokinetic sampling to reduce and maintain cyclosporine exposure to 50% of the usual levels is safe and reduces the risk of graft dysfunction.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Étienne et al. (2010) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: