This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
Objective: to construct and validate a checklist for patient safety during transfusion. Method: this is a methodological study whose development took place, between February 2020 and January 2021, at a teaching hospital in Santa Maria, RS, Brazil. The design was based on the survey of items in an integrative literature review, and validity, with 17 health specialists and 8 hemotherapy experts. Pre-test was carried out with 36 professionals from the target population. For data analysis, the Content Validity Index was calculated. Results: the checklist was composed of 29 items and 90 sub-items, distributed in three domains, corresponding to the transfusion act stages: Pre-transfusion (Medical prescription, Compatibility and Bedside identification); Transfusion (Blood component installation); and Post-transfusion (Monitoring). The items obtained a Content Validity Index predominantly > 0.80 in all stages. After reformulations suggested by participants, a Content Validity Index of 0.98 was obtained in its final version. Conclusion: the checklist demonstrated evidence of content validity and can be a reliable instrument to promote patient safety during transfusion.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Rambo et al. (2023) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: