This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
Information and communication technology (ICT) is becoming a system-scale driver of Europe's net-zero transition. Data centers concentrate electricity demand near cities while producing continuous cooling demand, and an increasing share of computing is deferrable in time. Yet most continental-scale energy-system studies still treat ICT demand as either exogenous or marginal, leaving its system-wide implications for net-zero planning insufficiently quantified. Here, using a Monte Carlo ICT-demand projection, country-level spatial disaggregation, and a continental EnergyScope-EU optimization framework, we quantify how these characteristics reshape near-optimal net-zero energy-system designs in Europe. Unlike prior studies, we represent data centers simultaneously as geographically concentrated electricity loads, sources of recoverable heat, and time-flexible demand within a continental multi-energy optimization framework. We find that data centers contribute ∼7.9% (667 TWh yr − ¹) of final European electricity demand in 2050 and provide up to 243 TWh yr − ¹ of recoverable thermal output from cooling with value concentrated in district-heating-ready urban areas. When a deferrable share of workloads is shifted toward wind- and solar-rich periods, the European curtailment rate declines from just over 9% (inflexible case) to ∼6.5% (fully flexible case), highlighting flexible computing as a measurable renewable-integration lever. These values reflect EU-wide totals, with system benefits concentrated in ICT-intensive load hubs (e.g., Germany, France, and Italy) for flexibility and in district-heating-ready countries for heat recovery. Explicitly representing data-center electricity, heat recovery, and workload flexibility are therefore necessary for credible decarbonization planning and for designing incentives that align digital infrastructure operation with system needs.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ravi et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: