Key result
Iranian cancer survivors' experiences of returning to work are influenced by individual perspectives, the nature of the disease, and access to support systems.
Cancer survivors' perspectives, disease nature, and support systems significantly influence their return to work, highlighting the need for tailored support and workplace preparation.
May inform tailored return-to-work support in cancer survivors; hypothesis-generating and leaves open validation in diverse settings.
OBJECTIVE: The study aimed to explore Iranian cancer survivors' experiences of returning to work. METHODS: Semistructured interviews were conducted with 20 cancer survivors at their workplace and in a referral cancer center. Data were analyzed using a conventional content analysis technique. RESULTS: Three main categories were identified as important in cancer survivors' experiences of returning to work: (1) individual perspectives, (2) nature of disease, and (3) access to support system. Results showed that returning to work contained different meaning for men and women. Also, it was found that cancer survivors had limited information about the disease and return to work that made them doubtful about returning to work. CONCLUSION: Cancer survivors have different individual perspectives that affect their decision about returning to work. Their perspectives should be assessed before returning to work, and necessary support should be provided for them in returning to work process. In this regard, health care systems and rehabilitation specialists should inform cancer survivors about the disease and return to work. Also, employers should prepare work places for cancer survivors' entrance.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zamanzadeh et al. (2018) studied Cancer (n=20). Return to work was evaluated on Experiences of returning to work. Iranian cancer survivors' experiences of returning to work are influenced by individual perspectives, the nature of the disease, and access to support systems.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: