Key result
Low attenuation plaque on CTA is linked to increased 18F-NaF coronary uptake in stable CAD.
Why the study?
In stable CAD patients with high-risk plaques on coronary CTA, predictors of abnormal coronary 18F-NaF uptake by PET were not well defined.
Does low attenuation plaque on CTA predict 18F-NaF uptake in patients with stable CAD and high-risk plaques?
Observational (n=55)
Does low attenuation plaque on CTA predict 18F-NaF uptake in patients with stable CAD and high-risk plaques?
Effect estimate: β = 0.47 (95% CI 0.30-0.65)
Absolute Event Rate: 1.6% vs 1.1%
p-value: p=< 0.001
In patients with stable CAD and high-risk plaques, low attenuation plaque on CTA is an independent predictor of 18F-NaF coronary uptake on PET, which may help identify patients who would not benefit from additional PET testing.
Hypothesis-generating for CTA triage of 18F-NaF PET in stable CAD; prospective validation needed before clinical adoption.
AIMS: In patients with stable coronary artery disease (CAD) and high-risk plaques (HRPs) on coronary computed tomography angiography (CTA), we sought to define qualitative and quantitative CTA predictors of abnormal coronary 18F-sodium fluoride uptake (18F-NaF) by positron emission tomography (PET). METHODS AND RESULTS: Patients undergoing coronary CTA were screened for HRP. Those who presented with ≥3 CTA adverse plaque features (APFs) including positive remodelling; low attenuation plaque (LAP, <30 HU), spotty calcification; obstructive coronary stenosis ≥50%; plaque volume >100 mm3 were recruited for 18F-NaF PET. In lesions with stenosis ≥25%, quantitative plaque analysis and maximum 18F-NaF target to background ratios (TBRs) were measured. Of 55 patients, 35 (64%) manifested coronary 18F-NaF uptake. Of 68 high-risk lesions 49 (70%) had increased PET tracer activity. Of the APFs, LAP had the highest sensitivity (39.4%) and specificity (98.3%) for predicting 18F-NaF uptake. TBR values were higher in lesions with LAP compared to those without [1.6 (1.3-1.8) vs. 1.1 (1.0-1.3), P = 0.01]. On adjusted multivariable regression analysis, LAP (both qualitative and quantitative) was independently associated with plaque TBR [LAP qualitative: β = 0.47, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.30-0.65; P < 0.001] and (LAP volume: β = 0.20 per 10 mm3, 95% CI 0.13-0.27; P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: In stable CAD patients with HRP, LAP is predictive of 18F-NaF coronary uptake, but 18F-NaF is often seen in the absence of LAP. If 18F-NaF uptake is shown to be associated with adverse outcomes and becomes clinically used, the presence of LAP may define patients who would not benefit from the added testing.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kwieciński et al. (2019) conducted an observational in stable coronary artery disease (n=55). Low attenuation plaque (LAP) vs. Absence of LAP was evaluated on plaque 18F-NaF target to background ratio (TBR) (β = 0.47, 95% CI 0.30-0.65, p=< 0.001). In patients with stable CAD, low attenuation plaque on CTA was independently associated with increased 18F-NaF coronary uptake (β = 0.47; 95% CI 0.30-0.65; P < 0.001).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: