Key result
Alteplase is linked to ~2x higher likelihood of achieving hemodialysis flow >300 mL/min versus urokinase.
Why the study?
The effectiveness of alteplase versus urokinase in restoring adequate hemodialysis blood-flow rates in catheter thrombosis was examined due to uncertainty in comparative efficacy.
Does alteplase improve hemodialysis blood-flow rates compared to urokinase in hemodialysis patients with catheter thrombosis?
Cohort
Does alteplase improve hemodialysis blood-flow rates compared to urokinase in hemodialysis patients with catheter thrombosis?
Alteplase is more effective than urokinase in restoring adequate blood flow in thrombosed hemodialysis catheters.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Alteplase may be associated with better catheter function than urokinase; hypothesis-generating and requires randomized confirmation before practice change.
The effectiveness of alteplase and urokinase in restoring adequate hemodialysis blood-flow rates was examined. A retrospective review of the medical records of hemodialysis patients with central venous catheters receiving alteplase or urokinase for presumed catheter thrombosis between June 1997 and December 2000 was conducted. Patients received 1 mL of alteplase 1 mg/mL or 1 mL of urokinase 5000 units/mL in each catheter port. The choice of the thrombolytic agent was left to the prescriber. Effectiveness of thrombolysis was defined as achieving a posttreatment hemodialysis blood-flow rate of > 300 mL/min, maintained for at least 30 minutes during the dialysis session. Inclusion criteria included adherence to the thrombolytic protocol and the inability to achieve a hemodialysis blood-flow rate of > 300 mL/min during the first 60 minutes of the hemodialysis session despite at least one attempt to reposition the catheter. Both thrombolytic agents significantly increased the hemodialysis blood-flow rates. Patients with alteplase-treated catheters were twice as likely to achieve hemodialysis blood-flow rates of > 300 mL/min (p = 0.0134) and were more likely to complete hemodialysis during that session (93% versus 70%, p = 0.0234). The percentage of functioning catheters at a subsequent hemodialysis session did not significantly differ between groups (p = 0.0806). The majority of patients in both treatment groups required no further interventions. Hemodialysis blood-flow rates increased after either alteplase 1 mg/mL per port or urokinase 5000 units per port was used to clear presumed catheter thrombosis. Alteplase was more likely than urokinase to result in a hemodialysis blood-flow rate of > 300 mL/min.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Eyrich et al. (2002) conducted a cohort in Hemodialysis-catheter thrombosis. Alteplase vs. Urokinase was evaluated on Achieving a posttreatment hemodialysis blood-flow rate of > 300 mL/min, maintained for at least 30 minutes during the dialysis session (p=0.0134). Alteplase was twice as likely as urokinase to achieve hemodialysis blood-flow rates of > 300 mL/min in patients with presumed catheter thrombosis.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: