Key result
TAVI programs without on-site cardiac surgery undergo review to address growing clinical needs and safety.
Why the study?
The increasing clinical need for TAVI due to population ageing is not met by current procedure availability, and the safety and implementation of TAVI in hospitals without on-site cardiac surgery departments remain uncertain.
Is it safe and feasible to perform TAVI in hospitals without on-site active cardiac surgery departments to meet increasing clinical demand?
Is it safe and feasible to perform TAVI in hospitals without on-site active cardiac surgery departments to meet increasing clinical demand?
Expanding TAVI programs to hospitals without on-site cardiac surgery could address growing clinical demand but requires careful consideration of patient safety and multidisciplinary evaluation.
Transcatheter aortic valve intervention (TAVI) was introduced in early 2000 to offer treatment to inoperable patients with severe aortic valve stenosis. In a couple of decades, the procedure resulted effective and safe also in patients with intermediate to low risk for surgery; therefore, due to the progressive ageing of the population, the clinical need for TAVI is continuously increasing and is hardly met by the availability of the procedure, the so-called "TAVI capacity". As a result, many patients encounter difficulties in being referred to TAVI centers or face long waiting list times, thus risking severe adverse events (including death) before the procedure is performed. Although contemporary guidelines and consensus documents recommend that TAVI should only be performed in hospitals with active cardiac surgery departments, starting TAVI programs also in interventional cardiac laboratories without on-site cardiac surgery could represent a way to increase TAVI capacity, thus leading to a greater number of patients being treated in less time. On the other side of the coin, such a strategy may jeopardize patient safety in case of periprocedural complications needing bailout surgery and may lead to a suboptimal multidisciplinary Heart Team evaluation. This review aims to assess and discuss available clinical data and implementation of TAVI programs in hospitals without on-site active cardiac surgery departments considering the growing unmet clinical need and technical advancement of TAVI platforms, yet not overlooking the recommendations of international scientific societies.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Rigattieri et al. (2022) conducted a review in Severe aortic valve stenosis. Transcatheter aortic valve intervention (TAVI) in hospitals without on-site cardiac surgery was evaluated. Transcatheter aortic valve intervention programs in hospitals without on-site cardiac surgery are reviewed to address growing clinical needs while considering patient safety and guidelines.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: