Key result
TAVI represents standard-of-care for inoperable patients and shows non-inferiority to SAVR in high-risk cases.
Why the study?
TAVI is established for inoperable and high-risk patients, but randomized trial data in intermediate-risk patients and standardized protocols for future trials are lacking.
Does transcatheter aortic valve implantation improve outcomes compared to conservative management or surgical aortic valve replacement in inoperable or high-risk patients?
Does transcatheter aortic valve implantation improve outcomes compared to conservative management or surgical aortic valve replacement in inoperable or high-risk patients?
TAVI is established as the standard of care for inoperable patients and a non-inferior alternative to surgery in high-risk patients, though evidence in intermediate-risk patients is still pending.
Affirms TAVI as standard for inoperable and high-risk patients; leaves open its role in intermediate-risk groups.
Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) is the new standard-of-care for inoperable patients with better outcome than conservative management, including balloon valvuloplasty only. In high-risk patients, TAVI has clearly shown non-inferiority compared with surgical aortic valve replacement. Although data from national multicentre registries are very encouraging and we are already speculating about the use of TAVI in intermediate-risk patients, it is of note that the two commercially available and used transcatheter heart valves (THVs) have not yet been assessed by randomised clinical trials in those patients. Technological advances promise to simplify TAVI and to improve outcome by reducing the rate of TAVI-specific issues such as stroke, peri-prosthetic aortic regurgitation, acute kidney injury, vascular complications and conduction disturbances. Therefore, results from ongoing trials with the available THVs are urgently awaited. In future trials, screening, treatment and follow-up of TAVI patients will need to follow a standardised protocol to achieve better comparability of study data to address, decisively, the question of whether intermediate-risk or low-risk patients may also profit from a less invasive TAVI approach.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sinning et al. (2012) conducted a review in Aortic valve disease. Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) vs. Conservative management or surgical aortic valve replacement was evaluated. Transcatheter aortic valve implantation is the standard-of-care for inoperable patients and has shown non-inferiority compared with surgical aortic valve replacement in high-risk patients.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: