Key result
High psychosis risk is linked to lower objective VO2max and higher BMI versus healthy volunteers.
Why the study?
There have been no investigations utilizing objective fitness assessment in individuals at clinical high-risk for psychosis, and the accuracy of self-reported fitness in this population is uncertain.
Cross-Sectional (n=80)
Yes
Individuals at clinical high-risk for psychosis have poorer objective fitness compared to healthy controls, and their self-reported fitness does not accurately reflect objective measures, highlighting the need for objective assessments in this population.
Objective fitness assessment may be needed in clinical high-risk psychosis; leaves open whether improving VO2max alters outcomes.
Exercise is a promising intervention for individuals at clinical high-risk for psychosis (CHR). However, these youth may not be reliable reporters on fitness. There have been no investigations that utilized objective fitness assessment in this population. The present study objectively characterizes the level of fitness in CHR youth, compares the accuracy of self-report measures to objective fitness indices, and explores clinical factors that may influence the accuracy of self-reported measures of fitness. Forty CHR individuals completed an exercise survey and objective indices of fitness (i.e., VO2max and BMI). Forty healthy volunteers completed objective indices of fitness and a structured clinical interview ruling out the presence of psychiatric illness. CHR youth showed greater BMI and lowered VO2max compared to healthy volunteers. In the CHR group, self-report items (perceived fitness) did not reflect objective indices of fitness, whereas specific exercise behaviors (intensity of exercise) showed stronger correlations with objective fitness measurements. Exploratory analyses suggested that symptoms (grandiosity and avolition) related to errors in self-perception. Results indicate that CHR individuals are less fit than controls as indexed by objective measures of fitness and that it is important to consider unique population clinical characteristics when employing self-report data.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Damme et al. (2021) conducted a cross-sectional in Clinical high-risk for psychosis (n=80). Clinical high-risk for psychosis vs. Healthy volunteers was evaluated on VO2max z-score (p=0.049). Individuals at clinical high-risk for psychosis had significantly lower objective aerobic fitness (VO2max) and higher BMI compared to healthy volunteers, with self-reported fitness failing to reflect objective metrics.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: