Key result
Verapamil SR-based strategy matches atenolol for BP control and cardiovascular outcomes in hypertensive CAD.
Why the study?
Limited data are available on the impact of blood pressure reduction on cardiovascular outcomes in hypertensive patients with coronary artery disease.
Does a verapamil SR-based strategy improve cardiovascular outcomes compared to an atenolol-based strategy in patients with hypertension and CAD?
RCT (n=22,576)
randomized
Yes
Does a verapamil SR-based strategy improve cardiovascular outcomes compared to an atenolol-based strategy in patients with hypertension and CAD?
In hypertensive patients with CAD, a verapamil SR-based strategy is equivalent to an atenolol-based strategy for blood pressure control and preventing adverse cardiovascular outcomes.
BP strategies in hypertensive CAD warrant targeted trials; leaves open optimal regimen for CV outcomes.
Hypertension is generally considered a risk factor for CV disease; however, limited data are available on the impact of BP reduction on CV outcomes in the hypertensive, CAD population. We evaluated the effects of verapamil SR-based (Ve) and atenolol-based (At) strategies on BP control and relationship to CV outcomes. In the prospective, randomized ternational VErapamil SR/trandolapril STudy (INVEST), 22,576 patients with hypertension and CAD were assigned to Ve or At strategies and followed for 2.7 years (mean). Dose titration and additional drugs (trandolapril and/or HCTZ) were recommended to achieve JNC VI BP targets (<140/<90 mmHg or <130/<85 mmHg in patients with diabetes or renal impairment). The primary outcome (PO) was time to first occurrence of death (all cause), nonfatal MI or nonfatal stroke. A verapamil SR-based or atenolol-based strategy results in equivalent BP control and CV outcomes in hypertensive patients with CAD. Increased systolic BP is associated with increased frequency of adverse CV outcomes in this population. Am J Hypertens (2004) 17, 116A–116A; doi: 10.1016/j.amjhyper.2004.03.304
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Giuseppe Mancia (2004) conducted an RCT in Hypertension and coronary artery disease (n=22,576). Verapamil SR-based strategy vs. Atenolol-based strategy was evaluated on Time to first occurrence of death (all cause), nonfatal MI or nonfatal stroke. A verapamil SR-based strategy resulted in equivalent BP control and cardiovascular outcomes compared to an atenolol-based strategy in hypertensive patients with CAD.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: