Mixtures of Gaussian Bayesian networks have previously been studied under full-covariance assumptions, where each mixture component has its own covariance matrix. We propose a mixture model with tied-covariance, in which all components share a common covariance matrix. Our main contribution is the derivation of its marginal likelihood, which remains analytic. Unlike in the full-covariance case, however, the marginal likelihood no longer factorizes into component-specific terms. We refer to the new likelihood as the BGe scoring metric for tied-covariance mixtures of Gaussian Bayesian networks. For model inference, we implement MCMC schemes combining structure MCMC with a fast Gibbs sampler for mixtures, and we empirically compare the tied- and full-covariance mixtures of Gaussian Bayesian networks on simulated and benchmark data.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Marco Grzegorczyk (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: