Key result
Hydroxychloroquine linked to ~168% higher risk of QTc prolongation vs no treatment.
Why the study?
Hydroxychloroquine, chloroquine, azithromycin, and lopinavir/ritonavir were used to treat COVID-19 and are known to potentially prolong QTc and induce arrhythmias, but the prevalence and risk in COVID-19 patients were unclear.
Do hydroxychloroquine, chloroquine, azithromycin, or lopinavir/ritonavir increase the risk of QTc prolongation and arrhythmic events in COVID-19 patients?
Meta-Analysis (n=13,087)
Do hydroxychloroquine, chloroquine, azithromycin, or lopinavir/ritonavir increase the risk of QTc prolongation and arrhythmic events in COVID-19 patients?
Relative Risk: 2.68 (95% CI 1.56–4.6)
In COVID-19 patients, treatment with hydroxychloroquine alone or combined with azithromycin significantly increases the risk of QTc prolongation, though reported arrhythmic events remain rare.
Supports QTc monitoring with hydroxychloroquine/chloroquine ± azithromycin; confirms elevated prolongation risk yet low reported arrhythmic events.
PURPOSE: Hydroxychloroquine, chloroquine, azithromycin, and lopinavir/ritonavir are drugs that were used for the treatment of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) during the early pandemic period. It is well-known that these agents can prolong the QTc interval and potentially induce Torsades de Pointes (TdP). We aim to assess the prevalence and risk of QTc prolongation and arrhythmic events in COVID-19 patients treated with these drugs. METHODS: We searched electronic databases from inception to September 30, 2020 for studies reporting peak QTc ≥500 ms, peak QTc change ≥60 ms, peak QTc interval, peak change of QTc interval, ventricular arrhythmias, TdP, sudden cardiac death, or atrioventricular block (AVB). All meta-analyses were conducted using a random-effects model. RESULTS: Forty-seven studies (three case series, 35 cohorts, and nine randomized controlled trials [RCTs]) involving 13 087 patients were included. The pooled prevalence of peak QTc ≥500 ms was 9% (95% confidence interval [95%CI], 3%-18%) and 8% (95%CI, 3%-14%) in patients who received hydroxychloroquine/chloroquine alone or in combination with azithromycin, respectively. Likewise, the use of hydroxychloroquine (risk ratio [RR], 2.68; 95%CI, 1.56-4.60) and hydroxychloroquine + azithromycin (RR, 3.28; 95%CI, 1.16-9.30) was associated with an increased risk of QTc prolongation compared to no treatment. Ventricular arrhythmias, TdP, sudden cardiac death, and AVB were reported in <1% of patients across treatment groups. The only two studies that reported individual data of lopinavir/ritonavir found no cases of QTc prolongation. CONCLUSIONS: COVID-19 patients treated with hydroxychloroquine/chloroquine with or without azithromycin had a relatively high prevalence and risk of QTc prolongation. However, the prevalence of arrhythmic events was very low, probably due to underreporting. The limited information about lopinavir/ritonavir showed that it does not prolong the QTc interval.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Diaz‐Arocutipa et al. (2021) conducted a meta-analysis in COVID-19 (n=13,087). Hydroxychloroquine vs. No treatment was evaluated on QTc prolongation (RR 2.68, 95% CI 1.56-4.60). Hydroxychloroquine alone (RR 2.68; 95% CI 1.56-4.60) and with azithromycin (RR 3.28; 95% CI 1.16-9.30) were associated with an increased risk of QTc prolongation compared to no treatment.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: