Experimental model study reveals distinct time-frequency radar signatures for water-, air-, and stone-filled tunnel lining defects, indicating improved non-destructive detection accuracy.
Aiming at the signal interference and feature recognition difficulties existing in the detection of concealed defects such as cracks and voids behind the tunnel lining, this study carried out a 1:1 reinforced concrete-steel arch frame composite lining model test; simulated the surrounding rock defects scenarios of three types of filling media, namely crushed stone, air, and water; and analyzed the time-domain, frequency-domain, and time-frequency-domain characteristics of the geological radar signal data. The research finds that the water-filled area generates a strong reflection due to the high dielectric constant, with the spectral peak reaching 712 MHz and the high-frequency component significantly enhanced. The peak frequency of the air-filled zone spectrum is 531 MHz, and the high-frequency bandwidth is broadened. The spectral peak of the crushed stone filling area is 507 MHz, with fast high-frequency attenuation and energy dispersion. The time-domain waveforms show that the amplitude in the water-filled area is the highest and the tailing is obvious, the waveform in the air-filled area is sharp, and the amplitude in the crushed stone-filled area is gentle. The peak frequency of the spectrum, the amplitude attenuation law, and the waveform shape can be used as the key indicators for discriminating the category of filling materials. The analysis method of feature fusion in the time-frequency domain has important engineering application value for improving the detection accuracy of geological radar in complex lining structures.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Liu et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: